『機動戦士ガンダムSEED & SEED DESTINY Fan Disc SEED SUPERNOVA』のDVDに収録されているアニメ。前半は『SEED』をモデルにした『ガンダム嫉妬』、後半は『DESTINY』をモデルにした『MISSION DD』が収録されている。キャラクターは全て2頭身で表現されているが、別にSDガンダムが出るわけではない。 　　『ガンダム嫉妬』 　　何をやってもアスランに勝てないイザークは、敗因が自分は種割れが出来ないからではないかと推測し、ディアッカを無理矢理誘い特訓に入る。結局種割れは会得できなかったが、諦めきれないイザークはアスランにビーチバレー対決を申し込む。 　　『MISSION DD』 　　アスランが離反した後のミネルバ。議長は過去にさかのぼってキラとアスランに仲たがいさせれば良いのではないかと考え、シン・ルナ・レイの三人は「ギル特製タイムスリップスティック」を使って過去へと向かうのだった。

『機動戦士ガンダムSEED & SEED DESTINY Fan Disc SEED SUPERNOVA』のDVDに収録されているアニメ。前半は『SEED』をモデルにした『ガンダム嫉妬』、後半は『DESTINY』をモデルにした『MISSION DD』が収録されている。キャラクターは全て2頭身で表現されているが、別にSDガンダムが出るわけではない。 　　『ガンダム嫉妬』 　　何をやってもアスランに勝てないイザークは、敗因が自分は種割れが出来ないからではないかと推測し、ディアッカを無理矢理誘い特訓に入る。結局種割れは会得できなかったが、諦めきれないイザークはアスランにビーチバレー対決を申し込む。 　　『MISSION DD』 　　アスランが離反した後のミネルバ。議長は過去にさかのぼってキラとアスランに仲たがいさせれば良いのではないかと考え、シン・ルナ・レイの三人は「ギル特製タイムスリップスティック」を使って過去へと向かうのだった。

《物质》定位十分明确：如何记录一个正处在转型期的国家？如何组织这些松散的材料？1989年前的生活给我们留下了什么？未来有什么希望？应该怎样处理这些“剩下的”图片？ 　　没有平白的叙述，只有导演的只言片语和Charles Ives哀伤的挽歌。导演通过对过去二十年来自己以及其他人拍摄的素材的整理和剪辑，让这些影像自己说话。从最近柏林的骚乱到1989年底亚历山大的大型集会，这是一个群众无视当局的罕见时刻，让人感觉任何事都可能发生。从舞台导演Fritz Marquardt在使《海纳穆勒的日耳曼-死在柏林》登上舞台的联合项目中的初步谈判到今天共和国宫的毁坏。在这部影片中，Heise用他自己的方式回顾了德国历史。从二十世纪八十年起Thomas Heise就开始这项工作，将社会政治问题融合在探索历史的过程之中。以新旧辩证的眼光，Thomas Heise密切的观察，让事件自己说话，为历史创造了更多可能。 　　A slow pan shot sweeps over a piece of wasteland next to a ruin, with the laughter of children playing in the distance: providing the background of these three motifs – childhood, landscape and loss. Then an announcement follows: “Certain things remain as surplus, leftovers that are undeveloped, unfinished. It is the same with images waiting for a story”. These unedited images, the very substance of the film, were made in the margins of other films (his own or other people’s) or shot under the urgent pressure of events. They cover the last twenty years. 　　The space of his Material is precise and well-defined: how to document a country undergoing transformation, how to articulate this scattered material, what is left of Life before 1989 and of the hopes for the future? What should be done with these ‘left-over’ images? 　　Nothing is explained directly, apart from a few rare snatches of the director’s commentary and the elegiac, melancholic music of Charles Ives. Heise leaves these situations caught up in their own intensity: from a recent riot of hoodies in Berlin to the enormous rally in the Alexanderplatz at the end of 1989, showing the crowds defying the authorities in one of those rare moments when there is a feeling that anything could happen; from preliminary discussions with the stage director Fritz Marquardt on a joint project to stage Heiner Müller’s Germania – Death in Berlin, to what remains today of the gutted Palace of the Republic. 　　In Material , Heise has constructed a personal reflection on Germany’s history and on his own method. Thomas Heise has been ploughing this furrow ever since the 1980s in the GDR, weaving together socio-political issues in his exploration of History. In a dialectic of the Old and the New, closely observing faces and letting words deploy themselves, he pays the necessary attention to this gesture, which opens up the material of History itself and its possibilities. 　　Film material shot over a 20 year period, a visual diary, outtakes that just will not leave their creators alone. Put together in a poetic way, in which chronology takes a back seat to sense and atmosphere. History is not a linear sequence but a pile of events.

《物质》定位十分明确：如何记录一个正处在转型期的国家？如何组织这些松散的材料？1989年前的生活给我们留下了什么？未来有什么希望？应该怎样处理这些“剩下的”图片？ 　　没有平白的叙述，只有导演的只言片语和Charles Ives哀伤的挽歌。导演通过对过去二十年来自己以及其他人拍摄的素材的整理和剪辑，让这些影像自己说话。从最近柏林的骚乱到1989年底亚历山大的大型集会，这是一个群众无视当局的罕见时刻，让人感觉任何事都可能发生。从舞台导演Fritz Marquardt在使《海纳穆勒的日耳曼-死在柏林》登上舞台的联合项目中的初步谈判到今天共和国宫的毁坏。在这部影片中，Heise用他自己的方式回顾了德国历史。从二十世纪八十年起Thomas Heise就开始这项工作，将社会政治问题融合在探索历史的过程之中。以新旧辩证的眼光，Thomas Heise密切的观察，让事件自己说话，为历史创造了更多可能。 　　A slow pan shot sweeps over a piece of wasteland next to a ruin, with the laughter of children playing in the distance: providing the background of these three motifs – childhood, landscape and loss. Then an announcement follows: “Certain things remain as surplus, leftovers that are undeveloped, unfinished. It is the same with images waiting for a story”. These unedited images, the very substance of the film, were made in the margins of other films (his own or other people’s) or shot under the urgent pressure of events. They cover the last twenty years. 　　The space of his Material is precise and well-defined: how to document a country undergoing transformation, how to articulate this scattered material, what is left of Life before 1989 and of the hopes for the future? What should be done with these ‘left-over’ images? 　　Nothing is explained directly, apart from a few rare snatches of the director’s commentary and the elegiac, melancholic music of Charles Ives. Heise leaves these situations caught up in their own intensity: from a recent riot of hoodies in Berlin to the enormous rally in the Alexanderplatz at the end of 1989, showing the crowds defying the authorities in one of those rare moments when there is a feeling that anything could happen; from preliminary discussions with the stage director Fritz Marquardt on a joint project to stage Heiner Müller’s Germania – Death in Berlin, to what remains today of the gutted Palace of the Republic. 　　In Material , Heise has constructed a personal reflection on Germany’s history and on his own method. Thomas Heise has been ploughing this furrow ever since the 1980s in the GDR, weaving together socio-political issues in his exploration of History. In a dialectic of the Old and the New, closely observing faces and letting words deploy themselves, he pays the necessary attention to this gesture, which opens up the material of History itself and its possibilities. 　　Film material shot over a 20 year period, a visual diary, outtakes that just will not leave their creators alone. Put together in a poetic way, in which chronology takes a back seat to sense and atmosphere. History is not a linear sequence but a pile of events.

After her boyfriend Ben, dumps her for being too dependent and emotionally immature, thirty something Miranda finds herself alone in an brand new unfurnished apartment with nothing but her childhood security blanket to keep her company. Determined to prove Ben wrong, she signs up for an amateur pro rules boxing fight. In the lead up to the fight, Miranda is forced to embrace the challenges of independent womanhood.

2016年4月19日，副警长利奥·科尔失踪。第二天早上，他的执法记录仪被发现了。

2016年4月19日，副警长利奥·科尔失踪。第二天早上，他的执法记录仪被发现了。

山城圭吾（菅田将晖 饰）一直梦想着能够成为漫画家，创作出脍炙人口的优秀作品。虽然圭吾的画功扎实编剧一流，但因为他本身是老好人的性格，所以一直无法创作出真实有冲击力的反派形象，因此，圭吾的事业总是停滞不前，直到现在依然只是一介名不见经传的漫画助手。 　　一次偶然中，圭吾成为了一场凶杀案的目击者。这特殊的经历改变了圭吾的性格，他决定以案件的犯人为原型，创作名为《34》的原创漫画。没想到，这部漫画一下子就火了，读者们纷纷被漫画中描绘的可怕犯人的形象所折服。但好景不长，没过多久，社会上就出现了以漫画内容为蓝本进行犯罪的模仿犯。

山城圭吾（菅田将晖 饰）一直梦想着能够成为漫画家，创作出脍炙人口的优秀作品。虽然圭吾的画功扎实编剧一流，但因为他本身是老好人的性格，所以一直无法创作出真实有冲击力的反派形象，因此，圭吾的事业总是停滞不前，直到现在依然只是一介名不见经传的漫画助手。 　　一次偶然中，圭吾成为了一场凶杀案的目击者。这特殊的经历改变了圭吾的性格，他决定以案件的犯人为原型，创作名为《34》的原创漫画。没想到，这部漫画一下子就火了，读者们纷纷被漫画中描绘的可怕犯人的形象所折服。但好景不长，没过多久，社会上就出现了以漫画内容为蓝本进行犯罪的模仿犯。

《角色》中，手握工程招采决策权的男主，自视感情主角，被女主精心设计的初见、偶遇与谈心步步吸引，深陷心动，认定对方为知己。殊不知女主的一切皆是围猎剧本，他终成权力利益交换的傀儡。影片揭露新型隐蔽围猎手段，警醒党员干部摆正人生角色。